Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 28 results ...

Babatunde, S O and Perera, S (2017) Cross-sectional comparison of public-private partnerships in transport infrastructure development in Nigeria. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 875-900.

Beitelmal, W, Molenaar, K R, Javernick-Will, A and Pellicer, E (2017) Challenges and barriers to establishing infrastructure asset management: A comparative study between Libya and the USA. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1184-202.

Caldas, C and Gupta, A (2017) Critical factors impacting the performance of mega-projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 920-34.

Chan, A P C, Wong, F K W, Hon, C K H, Ali, J A and Lyu, S (2017) Construction safety and health problems of ethnic minority workers in Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 901-19.

Dada, J O (2017) An appraisal of paradigm shifts required of competence of the Nigerian quantity surveyors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1269-80.

Damci, A, Arditi, D and Polat, G (2017) Civil engineers’ personal values/demographics linkage in project team building. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1337-49.

de Paula, N, Arditi, D and Melhado, S (2017) Managing sustainability efforts in building design, construction, consulting, and facility management firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1040-50.

Edirisinghe, R, London, K A, Kalutara, P and Aranda-Mena, G (2017) Building information modelling for facility management: Are we there yet?. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1119-54.

El-Hamrawy, S A-K, Abu El-Maaty, A E and Akal, A Y (2017) Proposed models to measure the quality of highway projects: Regression analysis vs statistical-fuzzy approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 988-1003.

Gledson, B J and Greenwood, D (2017) The adoption of 4D BIM in the UK construction industry: An innovation diffusion approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 950-67.

Hamzeh, F, Abdul, G O, Saleh, B M B and Abbas, Y (2017) Modular concrete construction: The differing perspectives of designers, manufacturers, and contractors in Lebanon. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 935-49.

Jaeger, M, Yu, G and Adair, D (2017) Organisational culture of Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1051-66.

Koops, L, van Loenhout, C, Bosch-Rekveldt, M, Hertogh, M and Bakker, H (2017) Different perspectives of public project managers on project success. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1294-318.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: project management; organizational culture; government; performance criteria; management; construction management
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2015-0007
  • Abstract:
    Purpose The authors argue that public project managers do not consider the iron triangle (cost, quality and schedule) primary important in measuring the success of their projects. To investigate which success criteria are important to public project managers, the authors interviewed 26 Dutch project managers who are employed by the government and who are responsible for managing infrastructural projects. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach In this research the Q-methodology is applied. Q-methodology helps to find for correlations between subjects across a sample of variables. Q-factor analysis reduces the individual viewpoints down to a few factors. A factor can be seen as the mathematical representation of an “average” perspective shared by a group of people. Findings Findings are based on the individual rankings of 19 success criteria; the authors distinguished three common perspectives: the holistic and cooperative leader, the socially engaged, ambiguous manager and the executor of a top-down assignment. In none of the perspectives the iron triangle criteria formed the top three to measure project success. Research limitations/implications The research results may have a national character. The way project success is perceived by public project managers may be culture dependent. For this the authors expand the research to other countries in the near future. Practical implications This paper contributes to the understanding of the public project manager by their private collaboration partners, like consultants, engineers and contractors. This will help them to understand their client and contribute to better collaboration in projects. Originality/value This paper shows that the difference in work attitude and value frame in the public sector leads to a specific view on project success.

Mosley Jr, J C and Bubshait, A A (2017) Project procurement systems for mechanical, electrical and piping projects in Saudi Arabia: An empirical assessment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1004-17.

Nikmehr, B, Hosseini, M R, Rameezdeen, R, Chileshe, N, Ghoddousi, P and Arashpour, M (2017) An integrated model for factors affecting construction and demolition waste management in Iran. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1246-68.

Osei-Kyei, R and Chan, A P C (2017) Empirical comparison of critical success factors for public-private partnerships in developing and developed countries: A case of Ghana and Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1222-45.

Ritson, N H, Wilson, M M J and Cohen, D A (2017) Managing engineering contractors in the UK petrochemicals industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1067-80.

Senaratne, S, Jin, X-H and Balasuriya, K (2017) Exploring the role of networks in disseminating construction project knowledge through case studies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1281-93.

Sepasgozar, S M E and Loosemore, M (2017) The role of customers and vendors in modern construction equipment technology diffusion. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1203-21.

Staykova, G and Underwood, J (2017) Assessing collaborative performance on construction projects through knowledge exchange: A UK rail strategic alliance case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 968-87.

Teo, A L E, Ofori, G, Tjandra, I and Kim, H (2017) Framework for productivity and safety enhancement system using BIM in Singapore. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1350-71.

Tran, D Q, Nguyen, L D and Faught, A (2017) Examination of communication processes in design-build project delivery in building construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1319-36.

Trigunarsyah, B (2017) Organizational culture influence on client involvement. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1155-69.

Venselaar, M and Wamelink, H (2017) The nature of qualitative construction partnering research: Literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1092-118.

Vu, H A, Cu, V H, Min, L X and Wang, J Q (2017) Risk analysis of schedule delays in international highway projects in Vietnam using a structural equation model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1018-39.

Wang, C, Li, B, Li, B and Baldwin, A (2017) Case study of “project controlling” on a large HOPSCA project in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 862-74.

Yu, A T W (2017) Using jigsaw method to enhance the learning of research and consultancy techniques for postgraduate students. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1081-91.

Yu, J, Ma, G and Jiang, X (2017) Impact of the built environment and care services within rural nursing homes in China on quality of life for elderly residents. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1170-83.